For some people, the need to cover redundancy with some form of unemployment insurance will be self-evident; for others, there could remain the somewhat misplaced belief that redundancy is precisely the kind of situation in which the fabled “welfare state” will come riding to the rescue.
Those with good reason to worry whether their jobs will survive the current economic recession are those taking heed of the recent newspaper headlines about the rising tide of unemployment. According to The Independent newspaper on the 24 October 2008, for example, on current trends, the total number of unemployed will have reached 2 million by this Christmas, while economic analysts predict that the figure will rise to 3 million by the close of 2010.
With the odds on any one, individual job falling prey to redundancy on an ever-upward trend, therefore, many of those currently in employment are already looking to cover redundancy with insurance that will provide some form of financial security in the event that the worst should happen to their own job.
With those same odds on the risk of other jobs being lost, some people lay store in the provisions of the so-called welfare state. On closer examination, however, these provisions seem frugal indeed. Currently statutory redundancy pay, for example, can only be claimed by those who have been continuously employed by the same employer for at least the previous two years. For those who qualify, the payment is just half a week’s normal pay for every complete year of service for those aged less than 22; one week’s pay for each year of service for those between the ages of 22 and 41; and one and a half week’s pay for each complete year of service for those aged 41 and above.
In addition to redundancy pay, Job Seekers’ Allowance is also payable to those looking for work. But the current rates of that allowance are – at the maximum – a meagre £60.50 each week for those aged over 25 (it is still less for younger claimants).
All in all, therefore, the welfare state offers very low rates of redundancy cover and most working people would be hard-pressed to meet the normal round of household bills and expenses from even the maximum rates of benefit offered – hence the attraction of individually-tailored redundancy or unemployment insurance.
As the spokesman for one of the country’s leading independent providers of this product, Simon Burgess of British Insurance, puts it: “long gone are the days of a cradle-to-the-grave welfare state that looks after us when the going gets tough. In this day and age, it’s down to the individual to make sure to cover redundancy – the welfare state is ill-equipped to make as good a job of it”.
For many years I have been a staunch campaigner against the major names in finance who, I believe, rip-off their customers by selling over priced, often unsuitable payment protection insurance (PPI) cover.